🔗 Share this article

The Evolution of a Cult tends to be marked by specific steps.

1. The Core Concept

A charismatic leader or figureheads present a new and transcendent idea offering a cure for struggling players.

So here we are. They’re getting ready to storm the compound down in Brisbane. Tensions are rising. Smoke is rising from the out-houses. One individual, exposed, nervous, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT smeared across his chest as a statement, has come staggering through the lines and is removed with discretion towards an inconclusive loan stint at Derbyshire.

Do you recall the beginning, when optimism reigned? The initial phase, of uninhibited aggression.

2. The Honeymoon Phase

Cult leaders guarantee a fresh beginning, a brighter tomorrow, support, redemption within a community who all believe in the method.

What was this thing at first? Players celebrating feeling good. Body art. Forearms. Determination. Peak performance vibes. Admittedly, The squad insist Bazball doesn’t actually exist, amusingly because if it doesn’t exist, what exactly did I just watch?

But we know what it is. It’s the player playing a shot so unconventional it’s beyond belief. It’s the adrenaline of Ben Stokes in his final form, an expression conveying: focused titan, beard made of wood, untamed style, so authentically Modern Savage you half-expect to glance over and see him playing in the field shirtless holding a fish.

It’s the batsman often seen addressing the media, resembling a joyful figure formally attired, uttering phrases such as we are actively deconstructing the orange. Indeed, the vibe, for quite a long time, was entirely positive.

3. The Growth Phase

Development stage. Togetherness strengthened through repetition of the cult’s slogans. These principles are often illogical as a loyalty check.

Am I alone? The criticism, the anger, the sense of betrayal after the first Ashes Test defeat seems too strong, too much. The batting collapsed on the field, as is typical there. They were dominated while bowling for a couple of hours as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, outplayed by Travis Head playing aggressively but smarter, adaptive to conditions, a man playing with a kind of light around him.

And now we have this the criticism, the anger, the sense of English Test cricket as a failure. The consensus is that losing isn’t enough, they must be humbled, to be scoured, destroyed, destroyed via traditional methods of the pace attack, the conventional tactics of the bowler, seen enjoying successes modestly as if receiving a nice new fishing rod. How will they respond?

4. External Conflict

Challenges surface from failures in the plan. Yet, mistakes are denied. It starts to feed on anger towards critics.

The fact remains, half a week out the next match, we’ve entered a critical juncture in the journey of this movement. England could quite easily win in Brisbane through aggressive play. More likely, defeat could come swiftly. Should they fail it seems we really might be entering the decline.

Prior to that, a couple of points worth saying on the topic. Previously, during the initial excitement, of optimism and energy, I wrote an article calling it a phenomenon. There was outrage, which demonstrated because everyone knows the best way of proving that it’s not a closed group is should followers respond with anger denying scrutiny of its truths.

Recent events in the last few days is just as interesting. Criticism of the approach has turned into a movement. Online outrage is widespread, disappointed commentators, shots of angry middle-aged supporters abroad disappointed by the short match, reminiscent of timeshare owners seeking justice.

Conversely, exists the larger scene of the host’s complex deep-seated frustration at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, out there saying, the methods you value and have developed to distinguish yourselves from the opposition, it’s just a joke in the end old boy.

This is the core issue. Everything is a cult. The style was a trend as the game has its own culture. Or rather, the sport in England is closed, a circle, a private event, a restricted environment with a long history of opaque and ritualistic cult history defining it. It has long been a place where power and access are hoarded. It’s the colonial game of the British, the early image-makers. And surprisingly, Britain is itself a cult, a structure of hidden ranks, a monarchy still exists.

The players have been isolated in this system from a young age. In trying to escape from it, to create a less brutal environment, they are simply replicating their past, creating another a bubble, an exclusive group, but now with 15 cool guys and a leader promoting authenticity as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.

Focus on the moment. Embrace challenges. However much you change, you remain stuck.

Considering this, it might be appropriate to have some sympathy for the movement, to acknowledge its merits, that are numerous. How to define it? Creating a sense of freedom. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with