🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, though, could coincide too neatly with the carefully constructed version promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Strongman

Over a long period, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a tailor-made persona of the president. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show launched last October, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from chaos. While the character's name Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this identical story instead of debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, the president is shown as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the background, seeking permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged him to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a casting call with many candidates. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the country in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, including a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer familiar with the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “spy” may in part have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. His harder version led Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor popular with viewers there, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an all-powerful presence who never appears directly. He is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently validate the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.