🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation and Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Order: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for playing excessively that system. Hire the project manager and later bin them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.